Bombshell: Hunter Biden’s Ex-Partner Says Former Vice President Joe Biden Stood To Cash In On China Deal

OPINION | This article contains opinion. This site is licensed to publish this content.

Tony Bobulinski one of the recipients of an email published by the New York Times, confirmed that the email strand was in fact, “genuine,” according to Fox News.

Bobulinski said he is the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings, which he explained “was a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family.”

“I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line,” Bobulinski revealed.

“The Biden family aggressively leveraged the Biden family name to make millions of dollars from foreign entities even though some were from communist controlled China,” he added.

“I have extensive relevant records and communications and I intend to produce those items to both Committees in the immediate future,” he said.

“Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese.”

From Fox News:

The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details.

“The reference to ‘the Big Guy’ in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden,” Bobulinski said in a statement to Fox News.

Bobulinksi also said that he believes that the Chinese involvement in the deal was “political or influence investment.”

After the New York Post published emails reportedly recovered from a laptop said to have belonged to Hunter Biden, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., claimed that the information was not legitimate and that it was part of a Russian disinformation scheme. Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe pushed back against this claim, saying “there is no intelligence that supports that.”

“Any suggestion to the contrary is false and offensive,” he said.